AFFiNE vs Tana
A side-by-side comparison of AFFiNE and Tana, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | AFFiNE | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Productivity | Meeting |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, iOS |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | — |
| Vendor (differs) | AFFiNE (toeverything) | Tana |
The honest brief
AFFiNE
One canvas for docs, whiteboard, and databases — self-hostable, with local-first CRDT sync and offline editing.
- Open-source (MIT editor), self-hostable
- Docs + whiteboard + DB in one canvas
- Offline-capable with CRDT sync
- Desktop, web, and mobile apps
- Self-host caps at 3 users without cloud
- Databases less mature than Notion's
- AI UI rough; lacks find-and-replace
Tana
Its agents act live during the meeting — drafting PRs, tickets and storyboards — instead of just summarizing after, over a persistent context graph.
- Agents draft PRs, tickets, storyboards
- Persistent cross-meeting context graph
- Human-approval step for AI changes
- Integrates GitHub, Linear, Jira, Slack
- Recently pivoted; product still maturing
- Heavier concept than simple notetakers
- Pricing tiers shifting with the pivot