Heptabase vs Tana
A side-by-side comparison of Heptabase and Tana, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Heptabase
ProductivityVisual, whiteboard-based knowledge base with AI for understanding what you read.
View HeptabaseAt a glance
| Attribute | Heptabase | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Productivity | Meeting |
| Pricing (differs) | PAID | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Local | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, Web | Web, iOS |
| Model support (differs) | Single model (proprietary) | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Hepta Platforms | Tana |
The honest brief
Heptabase
Pairs an infinite visual whiteboard with AI that answers across your own PDFs, videos, and notes — spatial sense-making most PKM apps lack.
- Spatial whiteboards for connecting ideas
- AI Q&A cited across your own sources
- True cross-platform with offline support
- Strong PDF annotation and web clipping
- No free tier — paid plans only
- AI usage capped by monthly credits
- Visual-first approach has a learning curve
Tana
Its agents act live during the meeting — drafting PRs, tickets and storyboards — instead of just summarizing after, over a persistent context graph.
- Agents draft PRs, tickets, storyboards
- Persistent cross-meeting context graph
- Human-approval step for AI changes
- Integrates GitHub, Linear, Jira, Slack
- Recently pivoted; product still maturing
- Heavier concept than simple notetakers
- Pricing tiers shifting with the pivot