Fathom vs jamie
A side-by-side comparison of Fathom and jamie, two Meeting tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Fathom | jamie |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Meeting | Meeting |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, Browser extension | macOS, Windows, iOS, Web |
| Model support (differs) | Single model (proprietary) | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Fathom Video | jamie |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Fathom
Unlimited recording and transcription free forever; monetizes team analytics and CRM sync where rivals cap free minutes.
- Unlimited recording free for individuals
- Auto summaries, action items, clips
- Highly rated for accuracy
- CRM sync on paid tiers
- Best AI features gated to paid Team tiers
- Bot must join the call to record
- Less deep cross-meeting search than rivals
jamie
Captures meetings without sending a bot into the call, so it works on any platform and in person — then assigns speaker names after the meeting.
- No bot joins your calls
- Works online, hybrid, and in person
- Accurate post-call speaker labels
- Free tier; many languages
- Desktop/iOS capture only (no Android app)
- Notes processed in the cloud
When to pick which
Across the signals we compare, Fathom and jamie differ on platforms:
- Platforms
- Web, Browser extension · macOS, Windows, iOS, Web
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.