Decagon vs Fin
A side-by-side comparison of Decagon and Fin, two Support tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Decagon | Fin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Support | Support |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, API |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Decagon | Intercom |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Decagon
Prices per conversation or resolution, not per seat, and lets ops teach agents via natural-language procedures.
- Outcome-based pricing
- Ops author logic, engineers keep guardrails
- Chat, email, and voice
- Takes actions, not just answers
- Enterprise sales-only
- Setup and tuning required
- Model choice abstracted away
Fin
Outcome pricing — $0.99 only when it resolves — and runs on top of Zendesk, Salesforce, or Freshdesk, not just Intercom.
- Pay per resolution, not per seat
- No migration off your current helpdesk
- Multi-channel: chat, email, voice, social
- Performance guarantee on resolution targets
- $0.99/resolution adds up at high volume
- Real-world resolution rates below marketing
- 50-resolution monthly minimum
- Quality depends on help-center content
When to pick which
Both cover Voice agent and Ticket deflection.
Pick Decagon if you need Email assistant.
- Email assistant (secondary capability)
Pick Fin if you need Conversation intelligence.
- Conversation intelligence (secondary capability)