Bluedot vs Fathom
A side-by-side comparison of Bluedot and Fathom, two Meeting tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Bluedot | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Meeting | Meeting |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, Browser extension, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, Browser extension |
| Model support (differs) | — | Single model (proprietary) |
| Vendor (differs) | Bluedot | Fathom Video |
The honest brief
Bluedot
Records Zoom, Meet, and Teams calls without sending a bot into the meeting — capture happens via the browser or desktop, not a visible participant.
- No bot joins the call — less intrusive
- Works on Zoom, Meet, Teams, and in person
- Auto-syncs notes to CRM and Notion
- Free tier to try it out
- Free plan capped at 5 lifetime meetings
- Capture is tied to your browser/device
- Newer, smaller vendor than incumbents
Fathom
Unlimited recording and transcription free forever; monetizes team analytics and CRM sync where rivals cap free minutes.
- Unlimited recording free for individuals
- Auto summaries, action items, clips
- Highly rated for accuracy
- CRM sync on paid tiers
- Best AI features gated to paid Team tiers
- Bot must join the call to record
- Less deep cross-meeting search than rivals