Tines vs Zapier
A side-by-side comparison of Tines and Zapier, two Automation tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Tines | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, API |
| Model support (differs) | — | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Tines | Zapier |
The honest brief
Tines
Security-first automation: deterministic 'stories' with AI agents layered on top, not a generic Zapier-style builder.
- Built for SOC/security incident response
- Deterministic workflows, AI optional
- Self-hosting on Business/Enterprise
- Generous free Community Edition
- Strong governance and audit controls
- Niche focus narrows general use
- Self-hosting gated to paid tiers
- Smaller app-connector library than Zapier
- Enterprise pricing is opaque
Zapier
Unmatched breadth — thousands of app integrations — making it the default glue, with AI agents added on top.
- Connectors for most SaaS tools
- Easy no-code trigger/action setup
- In-workflow LLM calls and agents
- Massive template library
- Fast to glue two SaaS tools
- Task-based pricing climbs fast
- Limited branching/logic vs rivals
- Shallow for complex data workflows
- AI features feel bolted-on