Recall vs Supermemory
A side-by-side comparison of Recall and Supermemory, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Recall | Supermemory |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Productivity | Memory |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | — | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | Browser extension, Web, iOS, Android | API, Web |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Recall | Supermemory |
The honest brief
Recall
Goes beyond save-and-summarize: auto-links saves into a knowledge graph and resurfaces them via spaced repetition, so your library compounds.
- Save and summarize from anywhere
- Chat with your library
- Choice of AI model
- Browser, web, and mobile capture
- Best features behind premium
- Cloud-synced, not self-hosted
- Summary quality varies by source
Supermemory
MIT-licensed memory engine you self-host or call as a managed API — one recall endpoint across any model.
- MIT-licensed, self-host or managed
- Single recall API across any model
- Connectors: Drive, Gmail, Notion
- Ships MCP server and SDKs
- Younger project, evolving API
- Smaller track record than peers
- Self-hosting needs infra work