LibreChat vs Onyx
A side-by-side comparison of LibreChat and Onyx, two Assistant tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | LibreChat | Onyx |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Assistant | Assistant |
| Pricing (differs) | BYO KEY | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open source | Open core |
| Deployment | Self-host | Self-host |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, API |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Danny Avila / LibreChat | Onyx |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
LibreChat
Multi-user auth built in — the closest to a self-owned, team-wide ChatGPT across every provider.
- Unifies many providers in one UI
- Agents, code, RAG, web search
- Runs on your own infrastructure
- BYO keys or local endpoints
- Self-host + Docker setup needed
- BYO model keys (usage costs)
- Maintenance burden on you
Onyx
Formerly Danswer — MIT-core enterprise search/RAG over your own apps, self-hosted, optional features under open-core.
- Data stays on your own infrastructure
- Connects to company docs and apps
- Works with any LLM, incl. local
- MIT core, free
- Some features under separate license
- Self-host ops overhead
- Connectors need configuration
When to pick which
Both cover Chat with documents.
Pick LibreChat if you need Sandboxed code execution, Multi-model access, Text-to-image, and Web research agent.
- Sandboxed code execution (secondary capability)
- Multi-model access (primary capability)
- Text-to-image (secondary capability)
- Web research agent (secondary capability)
Pick Onyx if you need Agent framework, RAG pipeline, Cited answers, Unified search, and 1 more.
- Agent framework (secondary capability)
- RAG pipeline (primary capability)
- Cited answers (primary capability)
- Unified search (secondary capability)
- Knowledge graph (secondary capability)
They also differ on:
- Pricing
- BYO KEY · FREEMIUM
- License
- Open source · Open core