Khoj vs OpenClaw
A side-by-side comparison of Khoj and OpenClaw, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
OpenClaw
AssistantLocal-first personal AI assistant you run on your own devices, on any platform.
View OpenClawAt a glance
| Attribute | Khoj | OpenClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Research | Assistant |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | BYO KEY |
| License (differs) | Open core | Open source |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Self-host |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, Linux | macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, CLI |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | BYO key / model |
| Vendor (differs) | Khoj AI | OpenClaw Foundation |
The honest brief
Khoj
AGPL second brain that lives inside Obsidian, Emacs, desktop and mobile — self-host over your own notes and the web.
- AGPL-3.0 licensed, self-hostable
- Searches local docs plus the web
- Custom agents and scheduled automations
- Self-hosting takes setup effort
- AGPL license can deter commercial use
- Smaller team than big assistants
- Cloud tier needed for zero-setup use
OpenClaw
Self-hosted assistant run from WhatsApp/Telegram/Slack/Discord — one of the few that also runs on iOS and Android.
- Free to self-host on your own devices
- Controlled from common chat apps
- Gateway control plane, onboarding wizard
- BYO model key, no vendor lock-in
- Self-host setup required
- BYO key means separate model costs
- Young project, evolving fast
- Smaller community than hosted assistants