Inngest vs LangGraph
A side-by-side comparison of Inngest and LangGraph, two Orchestration tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
LangGraph
OrchestrationGraph-based agent orchestration. Stateful loops with checkpoints.
View LangGraphAt a glance
| Attribute | Inngest | LangGraph |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Orchestration | Orchestration |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | FREE |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open source |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | — |
| Platforms (differs) | API | API, CLI |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Inngest | LangChain |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Inngest
Durable, resumable functions with no message queue or worker pool for you to stand up and operate.
- Durable execution, automatic retries
- Pause/resume + fan-out + scheduling
- TypeScript-first, framework-agnostic
- Local dev server included
- Smaller ecosystem than Temporal
- Best fit TS/JS; other langs newer
- Hosted tier cost at high event volume
LangGraph
Durable checkpointed state-graph with human-in-the-loop — long agent runs pause and resume, unlike one-shot chains.
- Durable checkpointed state
- Low-level graph control
- Debuggable long-running agents
- Runs in production at major firms
- Steeper learning curve
- More boilerplate than chains
- Tied to LangChain conventions
When to pick which
Both cover Multi-agent orchestration.
Pick Inngest if you need Workflow orchestration.
- Workflow orchestration (primary capability)
Pick LangGraph if you need Agent framework and Agent memory.
- Agent framework (primary capability)
- Agent memory (secondary capability)
LangGraph leans on Multi-agent orchestration as a headline capability; Inngest treats it as secondary.
- Multi-agent orchestration (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Pricing
- FREEMIUM · FREE
- License
- Proprietary · Open source
- Platforms
- API · API, CLI