HeyMilo vs Maki
A side-by-side comparison of HeyMilo and Maki, two HR tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Maki
HRConversational AI agents that source, screen, interview, and assess candidates end to end.
View MakiAt a glance
| Attribute | HeyMilo | Maki |
|---|---|---|
| Category | HR | HR |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | Web |
| Model support | — | — |
| Vendor (differs) | HeyMilo | Maki |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
HeyMilo
Conducts adaptive interviews across voice, video, phone, and SMS — broader channel coverage than video-only AI screeners.
- Scales first-round screening
- Auto-builds interviews from JD
- Adaptive follow-up questions
- Transcribes and scores
- ATS-driven setup
- Early-stage, small seed
- No public pricing
- AI interviews can feel impersonal
- Screening only
Maki
Runs the whole top-of-funnel — sourcing, screening, and voice/video/text interviews with skill assessment — as AI agents layered on your existing ATS.
- Covers intake through hire recommendation
- Skill assessment via psychometric models
- Layers on existing ATS/HRIS
- Audited for bias by New York State
- Enterprise-only, demo-driven pricing
- No self-serve or free tier
- Candidate trust in AI interviews varies
When to pick which
Both cover Voice agent, Interview assistance, and Resume screening.
Pick HeyMilo if you need Transcription (STT) and Conversation intelligence.
- Transcription (STT) (secondary capability)
- Conversation intelligence (secondary capability)
Pick Maki if you need Calendar scheduling.
- Calendar scheduling (secondary capability)
They share capabilities, but each leads with different ones as a headline job:
HeyMilo is built around Voice agent.
- Voice agent (primary capability)
Maki is built around Resume screening.
- Resume screening (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Platforms
- Web, API · Web