Glasp vs Liner
A side-by-side comparison of Glasp and Liner, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Glasp | Liner |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Productivity | Search |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | — | — |
| Platforms (differs) | Browser extension, Web | Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, Browser extension |
| Model support (differs) | BYO key / model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Glasp | Liner |
The honest brief
Glasp
Pairs a social highlight network with multi-format capture (web, PDF, YouTube) and BYO-key AI summaries.
- Highlights web pages, PDFs, and YouTube
- Export to Obsidian, Notion, Roam
- Generous free tier
- AI summaries via ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini
- Highlights are public by default
- Private notes require paid Pro tier
- YouTube summaries need captions
Liner
Cited AI search with dedicated academic (Scholar) and writing modes, grown from a popular web-highlighter.
- Cited, fact-checked answers
- Academic + writing modes
- Broad platform + extension coverage
- Multi-model on Pro
- Best features behind Pro
- Jack-of-trades vs focused tools
- Less depth than specialist research apps