Gamma vs Skywork
A side-by-side comparison of Gamma and Skywork, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Gamma | Skywork |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Assistant | Agent |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | Web |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Gamma | Skywork AI |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Gamma
One prompt yields editable decks, docs, and full websites — not just slides like AI deck-only tools.
- Generates decks, docs, and websites from one prompt
- Surprisingly capable free tier
- Real-time collaboration like Google Docs
- Imports and restructures PDFs and decks
- Generate API for programmatic output
- Card-based layout limits free element positioning
- PowerPoint export reads like a static doc
- Brand kit is per-deck, not global
- Template and design variety is limited
Skywork
Outputs native, editable Office files (DOCX/PPTX/XLSX) end-to-end, where most agents stop at text or markdown.
- Produces editable Office-format files
- Specialized agents per document type
- Built-in deep research
- Free daily credits to try
- Credit limits on the free tier
- Output quality varies by task
- Crowded agent-suite market
When to pick which
Across the signals we compare, Gamma and Skywork differ on platforms:
- Platforms
- Web, API · Web
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.