Dropbox Dash vs Dust
A side-by-side comparison of Dropbox Dash and Dust, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Dust
AgentEnterprise platform for building and sharing custom AI agents on company knowledge.
View DustAt a glance
| Attribute | Dropbox Dash | Dust |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Search | Agent |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | PAID |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, macOS, Windows, Browser extension | Web, API |
| Model support (differs) | — | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Dropbox | Dust |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Dropbox Dash
Searches across your connected SaaS apps and files from one bar, and its business tier runs self-hosted AI so content stays in Dropbox's trust boundary.
- Searches across many connected apps
- Sourced, cited answers
- Self-hosted AI option for business
- Unified start page plus Stacks
- Best value needs many connected apps
- Richer features gated to paid tiers
- Younger than incumbent search rivals
Dust
Org-wide 'multiplayer' AI over shared company knowledge — agents are built once and reused across teams, not siloed per user.
- Agents shareable across the org
- Broad workspace connector library
- Per-agent choice of frontier models
- MIT-licensed open codebase
- No free tier beyond a 14-day trial
- Per-seat cost scales with org size
When to pick which
Dropbox Dash leans on Unified search as a headline capability; Dust treats it as secondary.
- Unified search (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Pricing
- FREEMIUM · PAID
- License
- Proprietary · Open core
- Deployment
- Cloud · Hybrid
- Platforms
- Web, macOS, Windows, Browser extension · Web, API
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.