Amp vs Cline
A side-by-side comparison of Amp and Cline, two Agent tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Amp | Cline |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Agent | Agent |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | BYO KEY |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open source |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Local |
| Platforms (differs) | CLI, VS Code extension | VS Code extension |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | BYO key / model |
| Vendor (differs) | Sourcegraph | Cline Bot Inc. |
The honest brief
Amp
Shareable, searchable agent 'threads' for the whole team, billed pay-as-you-go at zero markup over model prices.
- Zero-markup pay-as-you-go pricing
- Shareable/searchable team threads
- Routes across frontier models
- Works in terminal and editors
- Closed source
- Usage-metered costs can be unpredictable
- Newer than Cursor/Copilot
- Best value tied to Sourcegraph workflows
Cline
BYO-key VS Code agent that shows and asks approval for every edit and command — no markup, no lock-in.
- No vendor markup on token costs
- Approves every edit/command before running
- Bring any model (Claude, local, etc.)
- Plan/Act split for review before changes
- BYO-key means you pay provider token costs
- VS Code only, no standalone IDE
- Slower than Cursor on equivalent tasks
- No codebase indexing or background agents