Agenta vs Promptfoo
A side-by-side comparison of Agenta and Promptfoo, two Eval tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Agenta | Promptfoo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Eval | Eval |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | FREE |
| License (differs) | Open core | Open source |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | — |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | CLI, macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Model support (differs) | Model-agnostic | BYO key / model |
| Vendor (differs) | Agenta | Promptfoo |
The honest brief
Agenta
Unifies prompt management, eval, and tracing in one self-hostable tool, keeping the whole loop on your own infra.
- Self-hostable on your own infra
- Prompt playground plus versioning
- Human and LLM-as-judge evals
- Built-in tracing/observability
- Smaller ecosystem than incumbents
- Self-hosting needs maintenance
- Less mature than dedicated eval platforms
Promptfoo
Define evals in plain YAML and run one goldset across models in CI — a prompt regression fails the build like any other test.
- YAML-driven, version-controllable evals
- Runs in CI, model-agnostic
- Goldsets and rubric scoring
- Also does red-teaming/security scans
- CLI-first, less of a hosted UI
- Teams may want managed dashboards
- Config sprawl on large eval suites