Smartling vs ModernMT
A side-by-side comparison of Smartling and ModernMT, two Translation tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Smartling
TranslationEnterprise AI translation and localization with optional human review.
View SmartlingModernMT
TranslationAdaptive neural machine translation that learns from your corrections.
View ModernMTAt a glance
| Attribute | Smartling | ModernMT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Translation | Translation |
| Pricing (differs) | PAID | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | Web, API, Linux |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Self-contained (on-device) |
| Vendor (differs) | Smartling | Translated |
The honest brief
Smartling
Tiers content across AI Hub, AI Translation, and AI Human Translation, routing bulk copy to machines and key copy to people.
- Enterprise TMS + AI + human network
- Tiered quality routing
- Strong governance and integrations
- In-house translator network
- Custom enterprise quotes, opaque pricing
- Platform fee plus per-word cost
- Overkill for small teams
ModernMT
Adapts per string from your TM and edits on the fly, so there's no per-customer engine retraining like older custom-MT setups.
- Open-source ModernMT core, self-hostable
- Adapts to corrections without retraining
- Translation-memory and context aware
- Hosted Hyper Adaptive managed option
- Fewer languages than DeepL/Google
- Self-hosting needs ML/ops effort
- Quality varies by domain corpus