Prompt Security vs Zenity
A side-by-side comparison of Prompt Security and Zenity, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Prompt Security
SecurityRuntime security for enterprise GenAI: shadow-AI visibility, data-leak and prompt-injection defense.
View Prompt SecurityAt a glance
| Attribute | Prompt Security | Zenity |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API, Browser extension | Web |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Prompt Security (SentinelOne) | Zenity |
The honest brief
Prompt Security
Covers both employee GenAI use (shadow-AI visibility) and homegrown LLM apps in one runtime layer — now backed by SentinelOne.
- Real-time data-leak prevention
- Blocks prompt-injection attacks
- Browser-extension and API coverage
- Part of SentinelOne Singularity platform
- Enterprise, paid-only pricing
- Roadmap tied to SentinelOne integration
- Heavier than a single-purpose API guard
Zenity
Purpose-built for AI agents and copilots, not retrofitted app security — discovery, governance, and runtime threat protection from one console.
- Agent/copilot-specific security posture
- Covers low-code and no-code apps
- Backed by Microsoft's M12
- Discovery + runtime protection
- Enterprise-only, no public pricing
- Demo-gated onboarding
- Newer, fast-evolving category