Prompt Security vs Reco
A side-by-side comparison of Prompt Security and Reco, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Prompt Security
SecurityRuntime security for enterprise GenAI: shadow-AI visibility, data-leak and prompt-injection defense.
View Prompt SecurityAt a glance
| Attribute | Prompt Security | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API, Browser extension | Web |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Prompt Security (SentinelOne) | Reco |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Prompt Security
Covers both employee GenAI use (shadow-AI visibility) and homegrown LLM apps in one runtime layer — now backed by SentinelOne.
- Real-time data-leak prevention
- Blocks prompt-injection attacks
- Browser-extension and API coverage
- Part of SentinelOne Singularity platform
- Enterprise, paid-only pricing
- Roadmap tied to SentinelOne integration
- Heavier than a single-purpose API guard
Reco
Extends SaaS security posture management to AI agents, discovering and governing tools like Copilot and Agentforce alongside human identities.
- 200+ SaaS app integrations
- Covers human and AI-agent identities
- Shadow-AI and misconfig discovery
- Cyera integration for data-aware alerts
- Strong investor backing
- Enterprise-only, no public pricing
- Demo-gated onboarding
- Cloud-only
- Fast-evolving SSPM category
When to pick which
Reco leans on AI security scanning as a headline capability; Prompt Security treats it as secondary.
- AI security scanning (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Deployment
- Hybrid · Cloud
- Platforms
- Web, API, Browser extension · Web
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.