Playwright MCP vs Steel
A side-by-side comparison of Playwright MCP and Steel, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Playwright MCP
MCPMicrosoft's official MCP server for browser automation, driven by Playwright.
View Playwright MCPAt a glance
| Attribute | Playwright MCP | Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | MCP | Infra |
| Pricing (differs) | FREE | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open source | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | — | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | CLI, API | Web, API |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Microsoft | Nen Labs |
The honest brief
Playwright MCP
Drives the browser from the accessibility tree, not screenshots — deterministic, fast, and no vision model required.
- Official Microsoft MCP server
- Accessibility-tree, no vision model
- Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit
- Free and open source
- Needs an MCP-capable client
- Local browser setup required
- No hosted/cloud browser by itself
Steel
Open-source, Docker-self-hostable browser sandbox unlike most closed agent-browser APIs — run local or in cloud.
- Self-host via Docker or use the cloud
- Handles sessions/proxies/CAPTCHAs
- Page-to-markdown/screenshot/PDF
- Framework- and model-agnostic
- Infrastructure, not a full agent
- Managed cloud is metered
- Younger than incumbent scrapers
- Needs an agent framework on top