Pangea vs Prompt Security
A side-by-side comparison of Pangea and Prompt Security, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Pangea
SecurityAPI-based security guardrails for AI apps: prompt injection, PII redaction, and access control.
View PangeaPrompt Security
SecurityRuntime security for enterprise GenAI: shadow-AI visibility, data-leak and prompt-injection defense.
View Prompt SecurityAt a glance
| Attribute | Pangea | Prompt Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | API, Web | Web, API, Browser extension |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Pangea | Prompt Security (SentinelOne) |
The honest brief
Pangea
Ships guardrails as discrete, composable APIs you call à la carte — not one monolithic gateway you must route all traffic through.
- Composable, API-first security services
- Pay-as-you-go with free monthly balance
- Model-agnostic; sits in front of any LLM
- Integrates via LiteLLM and Portkey
- You wire the guardrails in yourself
- Less turnkey than full proxy gateways
- Newer to the AI-security space
Prompt Security
Covers both employee GenAI use (shadow-AI visibility) and homegrown LLM apps in one runtime layer — now backed by SentinelOne.
- Real-time data-leak prevention
- Blocks prompt-injection attacks
- Browser-extension and API coverage
- Part of SentinelOne Singularity platform
- Enterprise, paid-only pricing
- Roadmap tied to SentinelOne integration
- Heavier than a single-purpose API guard