Onlook vs v0
A side-by-side comparison of Onlook and v0, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Onlook | v0 |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Design | Agent |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Single model (proprietary) |
| Vendor (differs) | Onlook | Vercel |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Onlook
Edits your real Next.js + Tailwind code visually on an infinite canvas, keeping the codebase as the source of truth instead of exporting throwaway markup.
- Free to self-host
- Edits real code, not exports
- AI assistance for larger changes
- Works with Next.js, Tailwind, shadcn
- Hosted cloud pricing not public
- Scoped to the React/Next.js stack
- Young project (YC W25)
v0
Emits real shadcn/ui + Tailwind React code you can paste into a project — production primitives, not throwaway mockup markup.
- Uses production shadcn/ui primitives
- Copy-paste into existing projects
- Tight Vercel deploy integration
- Fast iteration in v0 projects
- Opinionated toward shadcn/Tailwind
- Single tuned model, not configurable
- Best within the Vercel ecosystem
- Complex apps need hand-finishing
When to pick which
Both cover Code generation, AI app builder, and UI design / design-to-code.
Pick v0 if you need App / agent deployment.
- App / agent deployment (secondary capability)
They share capabilities, but each leads with different ones as a headline job:
Onlook is built around Code generation.
- Code generation (primary capability)
v0 is built around AI app builder.
- AI app builder (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- License
- Open core · Proprietary
- Deployment
- Hybrid · Cloud
- Model support
- Multi-model · Single model (proprietary)