Onlook vs Uizard
A side-by-side comparison of Onlook and Uizard, two Design tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Uizard
DesignAI UI design: generate editable wireframes, mockups, and prototypes from a prompt.
View UizardAt a glance
| Attribute | Onlook | Uizard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Design | Design |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Self-contained (on-device) |
| Vendor (differs) | Onlook | Miro |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Onlook
Edits your real Next.js + Tailwind code visually on an infinite canvas, keeping the codebase as the source of truth instead of exporting throwaway markup.
- Free to self-host
- Edits real code, not exports
- AI assistance for larger changes
- Works with Next.js, Tailwind, shadcn
- Hosted cloud pricing not public
- Scoped to the React/Next.js stack
- Young project (YC W25)
Uizard
Its Screenshot Scanner turns any existing app screenshot into an editable mockup — not just text-to-UI; now backed by Miro.
- Screenshot-to-editable-mockup
- Generates multi-screen projects
- Aimed at non-designers and PMs
- Backed by Miro since 2024
- Lower fidelity than Figma output
- Web-only, cloud-only
- Not a handoff-grade design tool
- Generated layouts need refinement
When to pick which
Across the signals we compare, Onlook and Uizard differ on license, deployment, and model support:
- License
- Open core · Proprietary
- Deployment
- Hybrid · Cloud
- Model support
- Multi-model · Self-contained (on-device)
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.