Noma Security vs Zenity
A side-by-side comparison of Noma Security and Zenity, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Noma Security
SecurityEnterprise platform to discover, govern, and protect AI agents and applications.
View Noma SecurityAt a glance
| Attribute | Noma Security | Zenity |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support (differs) | — | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Noma Security | Zenity |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Noma Security
Spans the whole AI lifecycle — discovery, posture, red teaming, and runtime guardrails for agents and MCP servers — where most rivals cover one slice.
- End-to-end posture to runtime
- Inventories every model and data dependency
- Built-in AI red teaming
- Enterprise customer references
- Demo-gated enterprise pricing
- No self-serve or free tier
- Young company, founded 2023
Zenity
Purpose-built for AI agents and copilots, not retrofitted app security — discovery, governance, and runtime threat protection from one console.
- Agent/copilot-specific security posture
- Covers low-code and no-code apps
- Backed by Microsoft's M12
- Discovery + runtime protection
- Enterprise-only, no public pricing
- Demo-gated onboarding
- Newer, fast-evolving category
When to pick which
Both cover AI security scanning, Guardrails, and LLM observability.
Pick Noma Security if you need Red-teaming.
- Red-teaming (secondary capability)
They share capabilities, but each leads with different ones as a headline job:
Noma Security is built around AI security scanning.
- AI security scanning (primary capability)
Zenity is built around Guardrails and LLM observability.
- Guardrails (primary capability)
- LLM observability (primary capability)