Noma Security vs Prompt Security
A side-by-side comparison of Noma Security and Prompt Security, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Noma Security
SecurityEnterprise platform to discover, govern, and protect AI agents and applications.
View Noma SecurityPrompt Security
SecurityRuntime security for enterprise GenAI: shadow-AI visibility, data-leak and prompt-injection defense.
View Prompt SecurityAt a glance
| Attribute | Noma Security | Prompt Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | Web | Web, API, Browser extension |
| Model support (differs) | — | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Noma Security | Prompt Security (SentinelOne) |
The honest brief
Noma Security
Spans the whole AI lifecycle — discovery, posture, red teaming, and runtime guardrails for agents and MCP servers — where most rivals cover one slice.
- End-to-end posture to runtime
- Inventories every model and data dependency
- Built-in AI red teaming
- Enterprise customer references
- Demo-gated enterprise pricing
- No self-serve or free tier
- Young company, founded 2023
Prompt Security
Covers both employee GenAI use (shadow-AI visibility) and homegrown LLM apps in one runtime layer — now backed by SentinelOne.
- Real-time data-leak prevention
- Blocks prompt-injection attacks
- Browser-extension and API coverage
- Part of SentinelOne Singularity platform
- Enterprise, paid-only pricing
- Roadmap tied to SentinelOne integration
- Heavier than a single-purpose API guard