Navina vs Regard
A side-by-side comparison of Navina and Regard, two Healthcare tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Navina
HealthcareAI copilot that turns scattered patient data into point-of-care insights.
View NavinaAt a glance
| Attribute | Navina | Regard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support | — | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Navina | Regard |
The honest brief
Navina
Tuned for value-based care: surfaces HCC risk-adjustment coding and care-gap closure alongside the visit summary, not just ambient notes.
- Surfaces care gaps and HCC coding at visit
- #1 Best in KLAS 2025 clinician workflow
- Synthesizes fragmented records into a summary
- Integrates with Epic, athenahealth, Veradigm
- Enterprise-only; no solo-clinician plan
- No public pricing
- US value-based-care focus
Regard
Reads the full chart proactively before the visit — surfacing undiagnosed conditions and drafting the note, vs. ambient scribes that only capture the encounter.
- Proactive chart-wide analysis
- Improves diagnosis and coding capture
- Drafts near-complete notes
- Used by major health systems
- Enterprise deployment only
- Requires deep EHR integration
- Diagnosis suggestions need MD review