Nabla vs Regard
A side-by-side comparison of Nabla and Regard, two Healthcare tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Nabla | Regard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Model support | — | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Nabla | Regard |
The honest brief
Nabla
EHR-agnostic ambient scribe — its Nabla Connect module drops into any EHR, versus Epic-only or single-EHR scribes.
- EHR-agnostic via Nabla Connect module
- 35+ language support
- Real-time coding support
- Integrates with major EHRs
- Enterprise sales, no self-serve pricing
- Sold to health systems, not solo clinicians
- Accuracy still needs clinician review
Regard
Reads the full chart proactively before the visit — surfacing undiagnosed conditions and drafting the note, vs. ambient scribes that only capture the encounter.
- Proactive chart-wide analysis
- Improves diagnosis and coding capture
- Drafts near-complete notes
- Used by major health systems
- Enterprise deployment only
- Requires deep EHR integration
- Diagnosis suggestions need MD review