n8n vs Pipedream
A side-by-side comparison of n8n and Pipedream, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | n8n | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Orchestration | Automation |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | Web, API, CLI |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | n8n | Pipedream |
The honest brief
n8n
The self-hostable Zapier alternative with first-class AI/LangChain nodes and per-execution (not per-task) pricing.
- Free Community Edition
- 500+ integrations
- Visual builder bridging APIs and databases
- Per-execution pricing, not per-task
- Code nodes for full control
- Fair-code license, not OSI open-source
- Self-host carries ops overhead
- Steeper than Zapier for non-technical users
Pipedream
Drop real Node.js or Python into any step over 3,000+ managed integrations — code-level control where Zapier and Make stay no-code.
- Arbitrary Node.js/Python in any step
- Managed integrations with hosted auth
- Connect embeds integrations in your app
- MCP-native: connectors as agent tools
- Code steps mean a developer audience
- Cloud-hosted; limited self-host
- Usage-based credits can be opaque