mymind vs Supermemory
A side-by-side comparison of mymind and Supermemory, two Memory tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | mymind | Supermemory |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Memory | Memory |
| Pricing (differs) | PAID | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Browser extension | API, Web |
| Model support (differs) | — | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | mymind, Inc. | Supermemory |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
mymind
No folders, tags, or manual filing — AI auto-organizes every save into fast, visual associative search.
- No manual tagging or filing — AI sorts saves
- Privacy-first: no ads, tracking, or training
- Saves text, links, images, notes in one place
- Native iOS, Android, Mac + browser extensions
- Fast visual, associative search
- No free tier — paid subscription only
- Personal use, not a team/collaboration tool
- Limited structure for folder-minded users
- Export options are limited
Supermemory
MIT-licensed memory engine you self-host or call as a managed API — one recall endpoint across any model.
- MIT-licensed, self-host or managed
- Single recall API across any model
- Connectors: Drive, Gmail, Notion
- Ships MCP server and SDKs
- Younger project, evolving API
- Smaller track record than peers
- Self-hosting needs infra work
When to pick which
Across the signals we compare, mymind and Supermemory differ on pricing, license, deployment, and platforms:
- Pricing
- PAID · FREEMIUM
- License
- Proprietary · Open core
- Deployment
- Cloud · Hybrid
- Platforms
- Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Browser extension · API, Web
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.