mem0 vs Supermemory
A side-by-side comparison of mem0 and Supermemory, two Memory tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | mem0 | Supermemory |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Memory | Memory |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Open core | Open core |
| Deployment | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | API, CLI | API, Web |
| Model support (differs) | BYO key / model | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Mem0 | Supermemory |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
mem0
Fastest path to agent memory — extracts distilled facts with a tiny token footprint and the biggest community.
- Quick to adopt, broad framework integrations
- Stores distilled facts, small footprint
- Vector + graph + key-value storage
- Open-source with usable free tier
- Weaker on temporal/state-change queries
- LLM call on every write adds latency
- Test deletion/conflict handling for regulated use
- More library than full memory server
Supermemory
MIT-licensed memory engine you self-host or call as a managed API — one recall endpoint across any model.
- MIT-licensed, self-host or managed
- Single recall API across any model
- Connectors: Drive, Gmail, Notion
- Ships MCP server and SDKs
- Younger project, evolving API
- Smaller track record than peers
- Self-hosting needs infra work
When to pick which
Across the signals we compare, mem0 and Supermemory differ on platforms:
- Platforms
- API, CLI · API, Web
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.