Supabase MCP vs Smithery
A side-by-side comparison of Supabase MCP and Smithery, two MCP tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Supabase MCP | Smithery |
|---|---|---|
| Category | MCP | MCP |
| Pricing (differs) | FREE | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open source | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | — | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | API, CLI | Web, CLI, API |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Supabase | Smithery |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Supabase MCP
Official Supabase MCP with more security guardrails than most database MCPs, including a query-safe read-only mode.
- Manages DB, auth, storage, edge functions
- OAuth, project scoping, read-only mode
- Prompt-injection protections built in
- Erases editor-to-dashboard context switch
- Stored prompt-injection data-leak risk
- Risky against production without safeguards
- Some endpoints (execute_sql) still beta
- Runs under developer permissions
Smithery
Largest MCP registry (6,000+ servers) with managed OAuth and hosting, so agents get authenticated tool access without config wrangling.
- Browse and install community servers
- CLI installs without editing JSON
- Persistent authenticated connections
- Deploy your own servers
- Only the CLI is open-source (AGPL)
- Registry/hosting is a closed platform
- Quality of community servers varies
When to pick which
Both cover App / agent deployment.
Pick Supabase MCP if you need MCP server.
- MCP server (primary capability)
Pick Smithery if you need MCP gateway / registry.
- MCP gateway / registry (primary capability)
Smithery leans on App / agent deployment as a headline capability; Supabase MCP treats it as secondary.
- App / agent deployment (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Pricing
- FREE · FREEMIUM
- License
- Open source · Proprietary
- Platforms
- API, CLI · Web, CLI, API