Skip to content

Supabase MCP vs Smithery

A side-by-side comparison of Supabase MCP and Smithery, two MCP tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

Supabase MCP

MCP

Postgres + auth + edge functions from inside the agent.

View Supabase MCP

Smithery

MCP

Registry and hosting platform for Model Context Protocol servers.

View Smithery

At a glance

Feature comparison of Supabase MCP and Smithery
AttributeSupabase MCPSmithery
CategoryMCPMCP
Pricing (differs)FREEFREEMIUM
License (differs)Open sourceProprietary
Deployment (differs)Cloud
Platforms (differs)API, CLIWeb, CLI, API
Model supportModel-agnosticModel-agnostic
Vendor (differs)SupabaseSmithery

The honest brief

Supabase MCP

Official Supabase MCP with more security guardrails than most database MCPs, including a query-safe read-only mode.

  • Manages DB, auth, storage, edge functions
  • OAuth, project scoping, read-only mode
  • Prompt-injection protections built in
  • Erases editor-to-dashboard context switch
  • Stored prompt-injection data-leak risk
  • Risky against production without safeguards
  • Some endpoints (execute_sql) still beta
  • Runs under developer permissions

Smithery

Largest MCP registry (6,000+ servers) with managed OAuth and hosting, so agents get authenticated tool access without config wrangling.

  • Browse and install community servers
  • CLI installs without editing JSON
  • Persistent authenticated connections
  • Deploy your own servers
  • Only the CLI is open-source (AGPL)
  • Registry/hosting is a closed platform
  • Quality of community servers varies