Manus vs Poke
A side-by-side comparison of Manus and Poke, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Manus | Poke |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Agent | Assistant |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web | iOS, Android, Web |
| Model support (differs) | Single model (proprietary) | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Meta (formerly Monica / Manus AI) | Interaction |
The honest brief
Manus
A general operator that plans and executes multi-step non-code work autonomously, not a single-prompt chatbot.
- Runs tasks autonomously over hours
- Multi-agent orchestration in a Linux sandbox
- Strong GAIA benchmark scores
- Browses, drafts, and schedules for you
- Credits drain fast on complex tasks
- Reliability gaps; tasks fail mid-stream
- No SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA as of 2026
- China data-flow compliance concerns
Poke
Runs inside iMessage, WhatsApp, and Telegram — no new app to install — and you negotiate your monthly price with its AI.
- No new app — works in your messengers
- Proactive automations ("recipes")
- Connects email, calendar, 30+ apps
- Free for most non-real-time use
- Unusual negotiated pricing
- Real-time automations cost more
- Underlying models undisclosed
- Consumer focus, not enterprise