Make vs Trigger.dev
A side-by-side comparison of Make and Trigger.dev, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Trigger.dev
OrchestrationBuild and deploy durable AI agents and background workflows in TypeScript.
View Trigger.devAt a glance
| Attribute | Make | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Automation | Orchestration |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | Web, CLI, API |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Make | Trigger.dev |
The honest brief
Make
Visual-canvas builder that handles branching, loops, and conditional routing Zapier's linear steps struggle with.
- Expressive visual flow editor
- 2,500+ native integrations
- Strong branching and routing
- Cheaper per-operation than Zapier
- Steeper curve than Zapier
- Complex scenarios get hard to debug
- Fewer integrations than Zapier
- Cloud-only (no self-host)
Trigger.dev
Durable, long-running workflows as plain TypeScript functions, without learning a separate DSL or workflow engine like Temporal.
- Apache-2.0 open source
- Self-host or managed cloud
- No task timeouts
- Automatic retries + queues
- Built-in run observability
- TypeScript/JavaScript only
- Self-hosting needs Postgres + Redis ops
- Younger ecosystem than Temporal