Lovart vs Recraft
A side-by-side comparison of Lovart and Recraft, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Lovart | Recraft |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Image | Design |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web | Web, API |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Single model (proprietary) |
| Vendor (differs) | Lovart | Recraft |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Lovart
A conversational design agent that orchestrates many image/video models on one canvas, not a single-shot generator.
- End-to-end campaign output from a brief
- Chains multiple top-tier models
- Exports PNG/JPG/SVG/PSD and MP4
- Generous free tier for testing
- Credits drain fast on complex projects
- Unused credits reset monthly
- Limited fine-grained control
- Beta-feel bugs; spotty support
Recraft
The only major generator that outputs natively editable SVG paths — assets drop straight into Illustrator or Figma.
- Native editable SVG vector output
- Brand style sets for consistency
- Built-in vector node editor
- API access for pipelines
- Text rendering trails Ideogram
- Designer-focused, steeper than casual tools
- Free tier credits limited
When to pick which
Both cover Graphic design and Text-to-image.
Pick Lovart if you need Logo generation, Text-to-video, and Image editing.
- Logo generation (primary capability)
- Text-to-video (secondary capability)
- Image editing (secondary capability)
Pick Recraft if you need Image upscaling and Background removal.
- Image upscaling (secondary capability)
- Background removal (secondary capability)
Recraft leans on Text-to-image as a headline capability; Lovart treats it as secondary.
- Text-to-image (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Platforms
- Web · Web, API
- Model support
- Multi-model · Single model (proprietary)