Lovable vs Rork
A side-by-side comparison of Lovable and Rork, two Agent tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Lovable | Rork |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Agent | Agent |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | — |
| Platforms (differs) | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Single model (proprietary) |
| Vendor (differs) | Lovable | Rork |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Lovable
Wires a Supabase backend and GitHub sync into every generated app — leans full-stack where v0 stops at UI.
- Built-in Supabase backend
- GitHub sync + one-click publish
- Fast idea-to-shipped product
- Beginner-friendly, no-code path
- Can burn credits on complex apps
- Less control than hand-coding
- Opinionated React/Supabase stack
Rork
Mobile-first vibe coding that ships real native iOS/Android apps to the stores, where most prompt-to-app tools output web pages or wrappers.
- Live preview before you ship
- Ships to App Store and Google Play
- React Native + Expo (SwiftUI in Max)
- Free tier to start
- Rork Max is iOS-only (no Android)
- Higher tiers are credit-limited
- Premium native builder is $200+/mo
When to pick which
Lovable leans on Code generation as a headline capability; Rork treats it as secondary.
- Code generation (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Platforms
- Web · Web, iOS, Android
- Model support
- Multi-model · Single model (proprietary)
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.