Langflow vs n8n
A side-by-side comparison of Langflow and n8n, two Orchestration tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Langflow | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Orchestration | Orchestration |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, API |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | DataStax | n8n |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Langflow
A visual drag-and-drop canvas (vs code-first frameworks) for building agents and RAG, with Python under each node and self-host or cloud deployment.
- Visual, low-code flow builder
- Python-extensible nodes
- Self-host or managed cloud
- Export flows as APIs or MCP servers
- Complex flows get unwieldy visually
- Less granular than pure-code frameworks
- Still maturing post-acquisition
n8n
The self-hostable Zapier alternative with first-class AI/LangChain nodes and per-execution (not per-task) pricing.
- Free Community Edition
- 500+ integrations
- Visual builder bridging APIs and databases
- Per-execution pricing, not per-task
- Code nodes for full control
- Fair-code license, not OSI open-source
- Self-host carries ops overhead
- Steeper than Zapier for non-technical users
When to pick which
n8n leans on Workflow orchestration as a headline capability; Langflow treats it as secondary.
- Workflow orchestration (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- License
- Open core · Proprietary
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.