Lakera vs SPLX
A side-by-side comparison of Lakera and SPLX, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Lakera | SPLX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | API, Web | Web, API |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Lakera (Check Point) | Zscaler |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Lakera
Detection models trained on 80M+ real adversarial prompts from its viral Gandalf game; sub-50ms inline latency.
- Detection sharpened by the Gandalf game
- Low sub-50ms latency, inline-friendly
- Covers injection, jailbreaks, PII, data loss
- Model-agnostic API in front of any LLM
- Behavioral detection risks false positives
- Core product is closed source
- Enterprise pricing quoted by sales
SPLX
Continuous automated red teaming with thousands of domain-specific attack simulations, then turns findings into system-prompt hardening fixes.
- Automated, continuous red teaming
- AI asset discovery and governance
- Runtime protection for live AI apps
- Covers agents, RAG, and MCP servers
- Agentic Radar scanner is open source
- Sales-led, no public pricing
- Enterprise-oriented
- Now folded into Zscaler's platform
- Newer than traditional AppSec tools
When to pick which
Both cover Guardrails, Red-teaming, and AI security scanning.
Pick Lakera if you need Content moderation.
- Content moderation (secondary capability)
Pick SPLX if you need Regulatory compliance.
- Regulatory compliance (secondary capability)
They also differ on:
- Pricing
- FREEMIUM · PAID
- Deployment
- Hybrid · Cloud