Lakera vs Snyk
A side-by-side comparison of Lakera and Snyk, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Snyk
SecurityDeveloper security platform with DeepCode AI for SAST, SCA, and AI-generated fixes.
View SnykAt a glance
| Attribute | Lakera | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | API, Web | Web, CLI, API, VS Code extension |
| Model support (differs) | Model-agnostic | Self-contained (on-device) |
| Vendor (differs) | Lakera (Check Point) | Snyk |
The honest brief
Lakera
Detection models trained on 80M+ real adversarial prompts from its viral Gandalf game; sub-50ms inline latency.
- Detection sharpened by the Gandalf game
- Low sub-50ms latency, inline-friendly
- Covers injection, jailbreaks, PII, data loss
- Model-agnostic API in front of any LLM
- Behavioral detection risks false positives
- Core product is closed source
- Enterprise pricing quoted by sales
Snyk
DeepCode AI does inter-file data-flow SAST trained on 25M+ cases — symbolic+ML, not an LLM wrapper — with re-scanned autofixes.
- Covers code, deps, containers, IaC
- SAST and SCA in one platform
- Validated one-click autofixes
- Deep IDE/CLI/CI integration
- Per-developer pricing adds up
- Free tier has scan limits
- Can surface false positives