Lakera vs Prompt Security
A side-by-side comparison of Lakera and Prompt Security, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Prompt Security
SecurityRuntime security for enterprise GenAI: shadow-AI visibility, data-leak and prompt-injection defense.
View Prompt SecurityAt a glance
| Attribute | Lakera | Prompt Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | API, Web | Web, API, Browser extension |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Lakera (Check Point) | Prompt Security (SentinelOne) |
The honest brief
Lakera
Detection models trained on 80M+ real adversarial prompts from its viral Gandalf game; sub-50ms inline latency.
- Detection sharpened by the Gandalf game
- Low sub-50ms latency, inline-friendly
- Covers injection, jailbreaks, PII, data loss
- Model-agnostic API in front of any LLM
- Behavioral detection risks false positives
- Core product is closed source
- Enterprise pricing quoted by sales
Prompt Security
Covers both employee GenAI use (shadow-AI visibility) and homegrown LLM apps in one runtime layer — now backed by SentinelOne.
- Real-time data-leak prevention
- Blocks prompt-injection attacks
- Browser-extension and API coverage
- Part of SentinelOne Singularity platform
- Enterprise, paid-only pricing
- Roadmap tied to SentinelOne integration
- Heavier than a single-purpose API guard