Lakera vs Noma Security
A side-by-side comparison of Lakera and Noma Security, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Noma Security
SecurityEnterprise platform to discover, govern, and protect AI agents and applications.
View Noma SecurityAt a glance
| Attribute | Lakera | Noma Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | API, Web | Web |
| Model support (differs) | Model-agnostic | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Lakera (Check Point) | Noma Security |
The honest brief
Lakera
Detection models trained on 80M+ real adversarial prompts from its viral Gandalf game; sub-50ms inline latency.
- Detection sharpened by the Gandalf game
- Low sub-50ms latency, inline-friendly
- Covers injection, jailbreaks, PII, data loss
- Model-agnostic API in front of any LLM
- Behavioral detection risks false positives
- Core product is closed source
- Enterprise pricing quoted by sales
Noma Security
Spans the whole AI lifecycle — discovery, posture, red teaming, and runtime guardrails for agents and MCP servers — where most rivals cover one slice.
- End-to-end posture to runtime
- Inventories every model and data dependency
- Built-in AI red teaming
- Enterprise customer references
- Demo-gated enterprise pricing
- No self-serve or free tier
- Young company, founded 2023