Khoj vs Pieces
A side-by-side comparison of Khoj and Pieces, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Khoj | Pieces |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Research | Memory |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Local |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, Linux | macOS, Windows, Linux, CLI, VS Code extension, Browser extension |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Khoj AI | Pieces |
The honest brief
Khoj
AGPL second brain that lives inside Obsidian, Emacs, desktop and mobile — self-host over your own notes and the web.
- AGPL-3.0 licensed, self-hostable
- Searches local docs plus the web
- Custom agents and scheduled automations
- Self-hosting takes setup effort
- AGPL license can deter commercial use
- Smaller team than big assistants
- Cloud tier needed for zero-setup use
Pieces
Captures a rolling ~9-month work timeline on-device and air-gapped by default, so memory questions never leave your machine.
- Captures context across all your apps
- Long-Term Memory of work context
- Cloud or local LLMs, or BYO key
- Plugs into VS Code, JetBrains, browser
- Background capture is resource-heavy
- Developer-centric, niche audience
- Memory accuracy varies across apps