Hyperspell vs Zep
A side-by-side comparison of Hyperspell and Zep, two Memory tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Hyperspell | Zep |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Memory | Memory |
| Pricing (differs) | PAID | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | API | API |
| Model support (differs) | Model-agnostic | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Hyperspell (Digital Workers of California, Inc.) | Zep |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Hyperspell
Presents connected workspace data as a filesystem agents can mount, instead of making you build retrieval and a vector store yourself.
- 50+ prebuilt workspace connectors
- Filesystem interface works with any agent
- Continuous indexing into a context graph
- SOC 2 and GDPR compliant
- No public pricing listed
- Young, early-stage product
- Cloud-only; data is indexed off-box
Zep
Stores a temporal knowledge graph (via OSS Graphiti) that versions how facts change over time, not flat snapshots.
- Open-source Graphiti engine (Apache-2.0)
- Managed Zep Cloud option
- Pulls in chat + business data
- Long-term context for agents
- Graph approach has learning curve
- Cloud is credit-based pricing
- Heavier than simple vector memory
- Newer ecosystem
When to pick which
Both cover Agent memory.
Pick Hyperspell if you need RAG pipeline.
- RAG pipeline (secondary capability)
Pick Zep if you need Knowledge graph.
- Knowledge graph (secondary capability)
They also differ on:
- Pricing
- PAID · FREEMIUM