Skip to content

Hyperspell vs Zep

A side-by-side comparison of Hyperspell and Zep, two Memory tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

Hyperspell

Memory

Memory and context layer for AI agents.

View Hyperspell

Zep

Memory

Temporal knowledge-graph memory for AI agents.

View Zep

At a glance

Feature comparison of Hyperspell and Zep
AttributeHyperspellZep
CategoryMemoryMemory
Pricing (differs)PAIDFREEMIUM
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
DeploymentCloudCloud
PlatformsAPIAPI
Model support (differs)Model-agnosticMulti-model
Vendor (differs)Hyperspell (Digital Workers of California, Inc.)Zep

The honest brief

Hyperspell

Presents connected workspace data as a filesystem agents can mount, instead of making you build retrieval and a vector store yourself.

  • 50+ prebuilt workspace connectors
  • Filesystem interface works with any agent
  • Continuous indexing into a context graph
  • SOC 2 and GDPR compliant
  • No public pricing listed
  • Young, early-stage product
  • Cloud-only; data is indexed off-box

Zep

Stores a temporal knowledge graph (via OSS Graphiti) that versions how facts change over time, not flat snapshots.

  • Open-source Graphiti engine (Apache-2.0)
  • Managed Zep Cloud option
  • Pulls in chat + business data
  • Long-term context for agents
  • Graph approach has learning curve
  • Cloud is credit-based pricing
  • Heavier than simple vector memory
  • Newer ecosystem