Horizon3.ai vs Strix
A side-by-side comparison of Horizon3.ai and Strix, two Security tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Horizon3.ai
SecurityAutonomous pentesting that safely runs real attacks in production to find exploitable risk.
View Horizon3.aiAt a glance
| Attribute | Horizon3.ai | Strix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security | Security |
| Pricing (differs) | PAID | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | CLI, Web |
| Model support (differs) | — | BYO key / model |
| Vendor (differs) | Horizon3.ai | Strix |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Horizon3.ai
Agentless, production-safe pentests you can run continuously and on demand — replacing periodic manual engagements with always-on attack validation.
- No agents to deploy in your environment
- Runs continuously, not once a year
- Verifies fixes by re-testing
- Covers internal, external, cloud, hybrid
- 225k+ pentests run to date
- Enterprise pricing, quote-only
- Aimed at orgs with security teams
- Offensive testing needs careful scoping
Strix
Runs the app and confirms each vulnerability with a working proof-of-concept, cutting the false positives static scanners produce.
- Open-source (Apache-2.0)
- Validates findings with PoCs
- Runs locally via Docker or cloud
- Bring-your-own LLM provider
- GitHub Actions integration
- Requires your own LLM API key
- Needs Docker to run locally
- LLM costs scale with use
- Newer, shorter track record
When to pick which
Strix leans on AI security scanning as a headline capability; Horizon3.ai treats it as secondary.
- AI security scanning (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Pricing
- PAID · FREEMIUM
- License
- Proprietary · Open core
- Deployment
- Cloud · Hybrid
- Platforms
- Web, API · CLI, Web
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.