Harvey vs Legora
A side-by-side comparison of Harvey and Legora, two Legal tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Harvey | Legora |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Legal | Legal |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Harvey AI | Legora |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Harvey
The default general-purpose legal AI at scale: Vault analyzes up to ~100K-doc collections, used across AmLaw 100 firms.
- Adopted by most AmLaw 100 firms
- Bulk doc analysis via Vault
- Grounds answers in firm's own materials
- Operates across 60 countries
- No public pricing, sales-only
- ~$1,000+/lawyer/mo, 20-seat minimum
- Tuned to big-firm billable workflows
- Heavy enterprise onboarding
Legora
Collaborative legal workspace (formerly Leya) built largely on Claude — positioned as Harvey's main challenger.
- Multi-document review + research + drafting
- Collaborative workspace for legal teams
- Handles complex, high-volume matters
- Strong enterprise traction
- Enterprise-only, per-seat pricing
- No transparent public pricing
- Web-only platform
When to pick which
Both cover Legal research and Contract review.
Pick Harvey if you need Chat with documents and Contract drafting.
- Chat with documents (secondary capability)
- Contract drafting (secondary capability)
Pick Legora if you need Trigger-action automation, Long-form writing, and Regulatory compliance.
- Trigger-action automation (secondary capability)
- Long-form writing (secondary capability)
- Regulatory compliance (secondary capability)
Legora leans on Contract review as a headline capability; Harvey treats it as secondary.
- Contract review (primary capability)