Harvey vs LegalOn
A side-by-side comparison of Harvey and LegalOn, two Legal tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Harvey | LegalOn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Legal | Legal |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Harvey AI | LegalOn Technologies |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Harvey
The default general-purpose legal AI at scale: Vault analyzes up to ~100K-doc collections, used across AmLaw 100 firms.
- Adopted by most AmLaw 100 firms
- Bulk doc analysis via Vault
- Grounds answers in firm's own materials
- Operates across 60 countries
- No public pricing, sales-only
- ~$1,000+/lawyer/mo, 20-seat minimum
- Tuned to big-firm billable workflows
- Heavy enterprise onboarding
LegalOn
Redlines inside Microsoft Word against 50+ attorney-built playbooks — grounded in legal expertise, not a raw model.
- Redlines directly in Word
- Risk detection grounded in legal expertise
- Used by thousands of legal teams
- Contract review focus only
- Paid, no free tier
- Web/Word-bound workflow
When to pick which
Both cover Contract review and Contract drafting.
Pick Harvey if you need Chat with documents and Legal research.
- Chat with documents (secondary capability)
- Legal research (primary capability)
Pick LegalOn if you need Translation and Case management.
- Translation (secondary capability)
- Case management (secondary capability)
LegalOn leans on Contract review and Contract drafting as a headline capability; Harvey treats them as secondary.
- Contract review (primary capability)
- Contract drafting (primary capability)