Harvey vs Lawhive
A side-by-side comparison of Harvey and Lawhive, two Legal tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Harvey | Lawhive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Legal | Legal |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Harvey AI | Lawhive |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Harvey
The default general-purpose legal AI at scale: Vault analyzes up to ~100K-doc collections, used across AmLaw 100 firms.
- Adopted by most AmLaw 100 firms
- Bulk doc analysis via Vault
- Grounds answers in firm's own materials
- Operates across 60 countries
- No public pricing, sales-only
- ~$1,000+/lawyer/mo, 20-seat minimum
- Tuned to big-firm billable workflows
- Heavy enterprise onboarding
Lawhive
Consumer fixed-fee legal help: its AI 'Lawrence' (81% on the SQE) does routine work while SRA-regulated solicitors deliver — not enterprise lawyer tooling.
- Fixed, upfront consumer pricing
- Qualified human solicitors deliver work
- AI 'Lawrence' speeds intake and drafting
- Covers many everyday legal areas
- UK-only (US expansion underway)
- Consumer matters, not enterprise legal
- You still pay solicitor fees per matter
When to pick which
Harvey leans on Legal research as a headline capability; Lawhive treats it as secondary.
- Legal research (primary capability)
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.