Gumloop vs n8n
A side-by-side comparison of Gumloop and n8n, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Gumloop | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Automation | Orchestration |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | Web | Web, API |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Gumloop | n8n |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Gumloop
AI-native canvas where agents and workflows call each other, plus MCP integrations built from a prompt.
- AI-first node-graph builder
- Agents can call workflows and self-correct
- Build MCP integrations via natural language
- No-code, fast to prototype
- ~100 integrations vs Zapier's thousands
- Ecosystem still maturing
- Less mature error handling than Make
n8n
The self-hostable Zapier alternative with first-class AI/LangChain nodes and per-execution (not per-task) pricing.
- Free Community Edition
- 500+ integrations
- Visual builder bridging APIs and databases
- Per-execution pricing, not per-task
- Code nodes for full control
- Fair-code license, not OSI open-source
- Self-host carries ops overhead
- Steeper than Zapier for non-technical users
When to pick which
Both cover Workflow orchestration.
Pick Gumloop if you need Multi-agent orchestration, Web scraping, and MCP server.
- Multi-agent orchestration (secondary capability)
- Web scraping (secondary capability)
- MCP server (secondary capability)
Pick n8n if you need Agent framework, Tool / function calling, and RAG pipeline.
- Agent framework (secondary capability)
- Tool / function calling (secondary capability)
- RAG pipeline (secondary capability)
They also differ on:
- Deployment
- Cloud · Hybrid
- Platforms
- Web · Web, API