Glean vs Onyx
A side-by-side comparison of Glean and Onyx, two Assistant tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Glean | Onyx |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Assistant | Assistant |
| Pricing (differs) | PAID | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Self-host |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, Browser extension | Web, API |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Glean Technologies | Onyx |
The honest brief
Glean
Permission-aware knowledge graph that no-code agents can act on, not just search across your enterprise apps.
- Indexes 100+ enterprise apps
- Enforces each user's existing permissions
- No-code custom agents
- Strong onboarding/knowledge ROI
- Opaque, sales-only enterprise pricing
- High seat minimums (~100 users)
- IT-heavy to deploy and maintain
- Limited to supported connectors
Onyx
Formerly Danswer — MIT-core enterprise search/RAG over your own apps, self-hosted, optional features under open-core.
- Data stays on your own infrastructure
- Connects to company docs and apps
- Works with any LLM, incl. local
- MIT core, free
- Some features under separate license
- Self-host ops overhead
- Connectors need configuration