Skip to content

Glama vs Klavis AI

A side-by-side comparison of Glama and Klavis AI, two MCP tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

Glama

MCP

MCP server registry, inspector, and gateway.

View Glama

Klavis AI

MCP

MCP integrations and live environments for AI agents.

View Klavis AI

At a glance

Feature comparison of Glama and Klavis AI
AttributeGlamaKlavis AI
CategoryMCPMCP
PricingFREEMIUMFREEMIUM
License (differs)ProprietaryOpen core
Deployment (differs)CloudHybrid
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, API
Model supportModel-agnosticModel-agnostic
Vendor (differs)GlamaKlavis AI

The honest brief

Glama

Superset of the official MCP registry that scores servers and lets you test any of them in an ephemeral browser sandbox.

  • Indexes 10000+ MCP servers, security-scored
  • In-browser Inspector for live tool calls
  • Gateway adds auth, logs, access control
  • Hosting for private/public servers
  • Hosting and Gateway features are paid
  • Quality varies across indexed servers
  • Cloud-centric, not a local tool

Klavis AI

Hosted, OAuth-handled MCP servers benchmarked above several official ones on tool-call accuracy.

  • Open-source MCP servers (5k+ GitHub stars)
  • Hosted, multi-tenant OAuth handled for you
  • Broad app catalog: GitHub, Gmail, Jira, Slack
  • Self-host the images or use managed cloud
  • SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliant
  • Younger than general agent frameworks
  • Hosted pricing for scale not fully transparent
  • MCP ecosystem still fast-moving and unstable
  • Focused on integrations, not a full agent runtime