Glama vs Glean
A side-by-side comparison of Glama and Glean, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Glama | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | MCP | Assistant |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | Web, Browser extension |
| Model support (differs) | Model-agnostic | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Glama | Glean Technologies |
The honest brief
Glama
Superset of the official MCP registry that scores servers and lets you test any of them in an ephemeral browser sandbox.
- Indexes 10000+ MCP servers, security-scored
- In-browser Inspector for live tool calls
- Gateway adds auth, logs, access control
- Hosting for private/public servers
- Hosting and Gateway features are paid
- Quality varies across indexed servers
- Cloud-centric, not a local tool
Glean
Permission-aware knowledge graph that no-code agents can act on, not just search across your enterprise apps.
- Indexes 100+ enterprise apps
- Enforces each user's existing permissions
- No-code custom agents
- Strong onboarding/knowledge ROI
- Opaque, sales-only enterprise pricing
- High seat minimums (~100 users)
- IT-heavy to deploy and maintain
- Limited to supported connectors